JRS Statement: Napier Barracks must close immediately


JRS Statement: Napier Barracks must close immediately

We & others call on government to ensure asylum claimants have safe & dignified accommodation

06 September 2021

JRS Statement: Napier Barracks must close immediately

We are deeply troubled to learn that Napier barracks will remain in use as asylum accommodation for the next four years. We call on the government to close Napier immediately and ensure all asylum claimants have safe and dignified accommodation within British communities.

This site is prison-like and isolated, utterly inappropriate as accommodation for people seeking asylum and as a context for engaging with an asylum case. Working with people in Napier, we repeatedly see the crushing human impact of accommodation that feels very much like detention. We routinely witness rapid deterioration in mental and physical health. There is correspondingly compelling evidence that accommodating asylum claimants at Napier is harmful. Since it was first opened, there have been repeated and serious failings in even the most basic screening, in communication with people placed there, in provision of healthcare, in COVID-19 precautions and in offering access to legal advice.[i] The site was opened during a pandemic against the advice of public health authorities,[ii] and a COVID-19 outbreak then occurred.[iii] There is now another outbreak.[iv] A high court has found against the Home Office’s decision to use Napier on multiple levels.[v] This situation is both tragic and absurd. The use of Napier as asylum accommodation has been a shambolic failure with vast human cost and of no benefit to anybody. It must be abandoned. Still, the government pushes on.

The government has made use of emergency planning powers in order to extend the current use of Napier.[vi] There is no coherent reason for this. Asylum applications are at comparatively low historic levels,[vii] and evictions from asylum accommodation have, albeit unwisely, recommenced.[viii] This is a craven attempt to avoid scrutiny of a decision that is indefensible. It shows no respect for refugees, for the local community near where Napier is situated, or for the rule of law. At the same time as the government pleads emergency circumstances to circumvent due process in keeping Napier open, it is laying before parliament plans to use centres like Napier on a much wider scale in the Nationality and Borders Bill.[ix] This blatant dishonesty shows an ideological commitment to ghettoising asylum claimants that is willfully blind to humanity and to evidence. Napier must close.




Naomi Blackwell, Detention Outreach Officer, JRS UK

Dr Razia Shariff, CEO Kent Refugee Action Network

Maddie Harris, Director and Founder, Humans For Rights Network

Bobby Lloyd & Miriam Usiskin, Art Refuge

Pete Keenan, Kent Refugee Help

Indre Lechtimiakyte, Legal & Migrant Support Manager,
Kay Marsh, Community Engagement Coordinator, Samphire

Rev Bob Weldon TSSF Vicar, The Trinity Benefice, Folkestone, Diocese of Canterbury

Sally Hough, Drop in Centre Manager


[i] E.g., Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, “An inspection of contingency asylum accommodation: HMIP report on Penally Camp and Napier Barracks November 2020 – March 2021” (July 2021) highlighted poor screening for physical and mental health, poor continuity of healthcare, and poor communication with residents as key issues. In June 2021, the High Court found a COVID-19 outbreak to have been “inevitable” and again found profound failures in screening for vulnerability,  R (NB & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1489 (Admin). For details of issues in access to legal advice and further details on health issues, see the APPG on detention’s inquiry into quasi-detention, oral evidence session 1, available here.

[ii]  R (NB & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1489 (Admin).

[iii] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-56183137

[iv] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-58186216

[v]  R (NB & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1489 (Admin).

[vi] Planning permission is being extended via a Special Development Order: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/962/contents/made

[vii] Asylum applications in the UK peaked in 2002 at 84,132. They have since fluctuated. In 2018, the UK received 29,504, in  2019, it received 35,737, and in 2020 it received 29,456. In the year ending March 2021, it received 26,903, applications. See House of Commons Research Briefing on Asylum Statistics, July 2021.

[viii] https://naccom.org.uk/statement-and-briefing-we-condemn-the-increasingly-hostile-actions-of-this-government-towards-people-seeking-protection/.

[ix] Nationality and Borders Bill, Clause 11.


Image credit: Fire at Napier, photograph sent to JRS from person held at Napier

[All News]


Jesuit Refugee Service UK
The Hurtado Jesuit Centre
2 Chandler Street, London E1W 2QT

020 7488 7310

Subscribe to our newsletter


Follow Us